Motor vehicle lawyer for driving licence deprivation in Almaty — we analyse the procedure, not emotions

Message us on WhatsApp

A lawyer reviews the administrative protocol together with the driver

We look at the protocol and case materials: mistakes in the paperwork happen more often than you would think
We prepare the position before the first hearing, not after unsuccessful explanations
We represent the driver in court; the client's presence is usually not required
The first consultation is free, we assess the prospects honestly

Driver defence

We handle administrative cases where a driving licence is at stake

We study the case materials before the hearing and build the position on procedure

We work with footage from cameras, dashcams and witness statements

We appeal rulings to a higher court within the established time limits

We say it straight if the chances are slim — before payment, not after

Send us the protocol and your explanation — we will tell you whether there are procedural violations and what can realistically be done.

Message us on WhatsApp

9^years

driver defence

We handle administrative cases on licence withdrawal: review of the protocol, first-instance court, appeal.
140⁺

administrative cases

Driving while intoxicated, refusal to undergo examination, leaving the scene of an accident, repeat offences.
48^%

cases ended without licence withdrawal

Almost half of cases end with a fine or termination — most often due to procedural defects in the paperwork.
0^₸

initial consultation

We review the protocol and tell you straight whether there is a chance of keeping your licence and what deadlines you need to meet.

Refusal to undergo examination

The most common charge. We check the grounds for referral, the procedure followed, how the refusal was recorded and whether all mandatory participants were present.

Driving while intoxicated

We examine the report, the breathalyser readings, compliance with deadlines and procedure. Paperwork errors are a regular occurrence here.

Driving into the oncoming lane

We look at the scheme, road markings and signs on the stretch, and dashcam footage. The very fact of crossing is often disputable.

Leaving the scene of an accident

The key question is intent and awareness of the incident. A minor contact in a car park may have gone unnoticed by the driver, and that is provable.

Repeat offences

We check whether the previous order actually entered into force and whether the period during which an offence counts as repeat has expired.

Errors in the protocol

Wrong time, place, missing signatures and failure to explain rights, discrepancies between documents — grounds for terminating the case.

Appealing an order

Complaint to a higher court if the first-instance decision was made without regard to procedural violations.

Return of licence after the term

Support throughout the procedure for returning the licence, including retaking the exam and lifting restrictions.

Send us the protocol — a traffic lawyer for licence deprivation will tell you whether there is anything to challenge

The first consultation is free. If the procedure was carried out without violations and the position is weak, we will say so directly rather than promise a miracle.

Message us on WhatsApp +7 778 325 44 44

Protocol drawn up
Hearing scheduled
Licence already taken away

Cost

Cost of defence for licence deprivation

Indicative prices. The exact amount is stated after reading the protocol and case materials.

Service	What is included	Cost
Consultation on the protocol	Review of the document and assessment of the case prospects	free of charge
Legal opinion	Written analysis of the case materials and procedure	from 30,000 ₸
Preparation of the position and motions	Objections, motions to obtain recordings and summon witnesses	from 50,000 ₸
Defence in the court of first instance	Full conduct of the case until a decision is issued	from 120,000 ₸
Appeal against the ruling	Complaint and participation in the hearing before a higher court	from 90,000 ₸
Urgent visit to the driver	Attendance during processing and examination	from 60,000 ₸
Return of licence after the term	Assistance with the procedure for obtaining the licence	from 35,000 ₸

Prices are for reference only and do not constitute a public offer. Expert examinations and the state fee on appeal are paid separately.

Find out the cost for my case

How we build the defence motor lawyer for licence withdrawal

Reading the protocol

The first things we look at: time, place, signatures, explanation of rights and whether the details match across the documents.

Getting to know the case

We request the full case file. Before the hearing we need to know exactly what the court will read.

Checking the procedure

The examination, the referral for it, the participation of mandatory persons — this is where most violations occur.

Gathering evidence

Applications to obtain camera footage, summon witnesses and admit the recorder into evidence.

Contract and position

We fix the fee in writing and agree the line of defence before the first hearing.

Hearing

We represent the driver ourselves. Personal attendance is not always required.

Appeal

If the decision was made without regard to the violations — an appeal to a higher court within the deadline.

Return of the licence

If the withdrawal still took place, we handle the return procedure once the term has expired.

Has your licence already been taken?

The deadline for appeal is counted in days. Send the protocol to WhatsApp — we will tell you what can still be done.

Describe your situation

Team

Team of lawyers in Almaty

We handle a case from start to finish with the same team: you always know who is dealing with your matter and who to contact.

Asel Kurmanova

Lawyer for civil cases

Handles disputes over real estate, inheritance, contracts and transactions. Supports transactions from document review through to registration of title.

14 years of practice
Civil and housing disputes
Kazakh and Russian languages

Dmitry Kim

Lawyer for financial and motor vehicle disputes

Works with banks, insurers and debt collectors, handles recovery and bankruptcy cases, and defends drivers in administrative matters.

11 years of practice
Banks, insurers, motor vehicle disputes
Pre-trial settlement

Gulnara Abisheva

Lawyer for family and social matters

Handles divorces, division of property, alimony and disputes over children, as well as employment, pension and social issues.

9 years of practice
Family and employment disputes
Work with guardianship authorities

Yerlan Sagintayev

Lawyer for corporate law

Supports company transactions, arranges shares and corporate agreements, handles disputes between participants and reorganisation.

13 years of practice
Transactions, shares, corporate disputes
Support for investment rounds

Aigerim Nurlanova

Tax lawyer

Challenges notifications and inspection reports, handles tax disputes in court, supports inspections and recovers overpayments.

10 years of practice
Inspections and tax disputes
Working with the client's accounting records

Viktor Li

Construction and contract lawyer

Reviews contract agreements, estimates and acts, handles disputes over quality and scope of works, supports acceptance of facilities.

12 years of practice
Contracting, shared participation, acceptance
Working with construction expertise

Madina Ospanova

Intellectual property and IT lawyer

Protects copyright and trademarks, drafts contracts for IT teams and handles rights to products and code.

8 years of practice
Copyright, trademarks
Contracts for IT and studios

Sanzhar Ibraev

Bankruptcy and debt recovery lawyer

Handles bankruptcy and rehabilitation procedures, recovers receivables, defends directors against subsidiary liability.

15 years of practice
Bankruptcy, rehabilitation, debt recovery
S

Practice

Recent case stories from our lawyers in Almaty

Details have been changed and anonymised: the content of the case is protected by professional privilege.

Alcohol testing

The testing procedure was breached, and the report was drawn up as a formality

Situation: The driver was stopped at night and sent for alcohol testing. There were no attesting witnesses, the video recording was patchy, and the report contained no information about the calibration of the device. The driver was not given a full copy of the report, and no one told him of his right to a repeat test.
What we did: We requested the case file in full, including the video recording and the documents for the device. We drew up a list of procedural breaches tied to the timing of the recording and filed motions to exclude evidence obtained in breach of the procedure.
Outcome: The proceedings were terminated for lack of evidence: without correctly documented evidence, the offence could not be established. The driver kept his licence.

The driver's absence

The case was heard without him because the summons went to his old address

Situation: The client found out about the licence withdrawal by chance, during a document check on the road. The case was heard in his absence: notices were sent to an address where he had not lived for three years, and he had no opportunity to present his position.
What we did: We restored the appeal deadline by relying on improper notification and secured a review. At the new hearing we presented evidence that had not been in the case file: dashcam footage and a passenger's testimony.
Outcome: The order was quashed, the case was remitted for a new hearing and then terminated. The rights were restored two months after the client approached us.

Mitigation

There was a violation, but losing the licence meant losing the job

Situation: The driver admitted the violation; there was nothing to argue about. The problem was that he worked as a driver-forwarding agent: losing his licence automatically meant dismissal and the loss of the only source of income for a family with two children.
What we did: We did not build the defence on denying the obvious — we gathered evidence of mitigating circumstances: a reference from his place of work, documents on family composition and dependants, and a certificate confirming that driving is a professional duty. The admission of guilt was framed as active cooperation.
Outcome: The court limited itself to a fine without disqualification from driving. The driver kept his job, and the case was closed within one month.

Witnesses

The witnesses in the report turned out to be on-duty officers

Situation: The driver was removed from driving and sent for examination, with the paperwork drawn up in the presence of two witnesses. It later emerged that both named individuals were on duty and could not have been disinterested, and no video recording of the procedure was made.
What we did: We requested the case file and information on the persons named as witnesses, and established their official position at the time the documents were drawn up. We argued that the evidence obtained in breach of procedure was inadmissible, since in reality there were neither witnesses nor video recording.
Outcome: The report and the examination results were excluded from the evidence, and the proceedings were terminated. The driving licence was returned to the client within three weeks.

Medical examination

The device had not been verified, and the paper printout was not attached to the report

Situation: The driver was sent for a medical examination, and the result came back positive. The client maintained that the day before he had taken a medication prescribed by his doctor and had not consumed alcohol. He was given a copy of the report, but without the printout from the device attached.
What we did: We obtained the documents for the device and the registration log: the verification period had expired two months before the examination, and the paper printout had not been attached to the report. In addition, we submitted the doctor's prescription for the medication. We filed a motion to exclude the report and to summon a specialist.
Outcome: The examination report was found to be inadmissible evidence, and the case was terminated. The client kept his right to drive, and the legal costs were partially reimbursed.

Notification

The case was heard without the driver, who knew nothing about the hearing

Situation: The man learned about the disqualification from driving when his documents were checked three months after the order was issued. The notification had been sent to his registered address, where he had not lived for two years; in the report he had given his actual address and phone number, but these were ignored.
What we did: We obtained a copy of the order and the case materials, and established that the file contained the actual address he had given, to which no notification had been sent. We prepared a motion to restore the appeal deadline and an appeal pointing to the violation of the right to defence.
Outcome: The deadline was restored, the order was quashed, and the case was remitted for a new hearing. On reconsideration, a fine was imposed instead of disqualification — taking into account the circumstances and the absence of aggravating factors.

Left the scene

The driver was accused of leaving the scene over a scratch in a car park

Situation: The client's bumper caught the neighbouring car in a shopping centre car park; the damage was minor. He left a note with his phone number under the windscreen wiper and drove away. The owner of the other car called the officers, and the question of disqualifying the client from driving was raised.
What we did: We presented evidence showing there was no intent to leave the scene: a note with contact details, a parking camera recording showing the client's actions, and call records — the other party called him the same day, and the client answered immediately and came back.
Outcome: The proceedings on the charge carrying disqualification were terminated; the penalty was limited to a fine for a parking rules violation. The client compensated the other party for the damage voluntarily on the spot.

Mitigation

The right to drive was preserved because it was connected to his employment

Situation: A driver of a company vehicle committed a violation for which disqualification is provided. He did not dispute the circumstances — the fault was obvious. At the same time, driving was his only profession and the source of support for a family with three children.
What we did: We did not argue against the obvious and focused on the circumstances affecting the type of penalty: a reference from his place of work, information about his family composition and dependants, the absence of prior violations, voluntary compensation and admission. We filed a motion for a less severe measure.
Outcome: A fine in an increased amount was imposed instead of disqualification. The client kept his job; we expressly warned him that a repeat violation would make such an outcome impossible.

Useful information

Motoring lawyer for driving licence disqualification in Almaty: defence at every stage

Dmitry Kim Lawyer for motoring disputes

Published: 6 May 2026 Updated: 16 September 2026

In Almaty, a driver is stopped, a protocol is drawn up, he is sent for examination — and then the case goes to court, where the question of disqualification from driving is decided. Often the person does not understand what is happening at each stage, signs documents without reading them, and only later learns that he admitted to something that did not happen. Mistakes made in the first hours and days are the most expensive to correct later.

Another situation is when the ruling has already been issued. Then all attention shifts to appeal, and what matters here is the time limits, the content of the judicial act and how fully the materials were examined. A motoring lawyer for driving licence disqualification helps to work out what could have been done differently and what steps are available now.

Motoring lawyer for driving licence disqualification: how a case unfolds

A case does not start in court, but earlier — from the moment the officer drew up the protocol. It is at that moment that the evidence base is formed: explanations, reports, witness statements, video recordings, examination results. Whatever ends up in the materials is what the court will rely on. A defence position stated late, when the case has already gone to court, works less well: some arguments simply cannot be supported by evidence.

Disqualification from driving is considered by a court under the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Administrative Offences. A motoring lawyer for driving licence disqualification is needed at the outset, not after the ruling, because it is at the start that it is decided which evidence will enter the case and which will disappear without trace. An early position means written objections, motions to admit evidence and to summon witnesses, and recording procedural violations.

What is worth recording immediately:

A copy of the protocol and all attached documents
Details of witnesses who were present
Dashcam and phone recordings
Comments on the protocol, if the officer refused to include them

Motoring lawyer for disqualification for drink-driving: what the examination decides

Examination for intoxication is the key evidence in a case for disqualification for drink-driving, and the procedure for conducting it is strictly regulated. Procedural violations directly affect the evidentiary value of the report: they can be challenged in court. A motoring lawyer for disqualification checks every step taken by the officer — from the grounds for referral for examination to the formalisation of the result.

Where the report is drawn up with procedural defects, the defence is built on having the evidence recognised as inadmissible. A lawyer for disqualification for drink-driving looks at the following.

Who conducted the examination and in whose presence as attesting witnesses
Whether the device was operated in accordance with the established procedure and whether there is a verification certificate
Whether the device readings and the time they were recorded correspond to the data in the report
Whether the report states the driver's refusal or consent
Whether the results of the medical examination are attached, if one was carried out

Lawyer for driving licence deprivation: the driver's rights in the case

In a driving licence deprivation case, the driver does not remain an observer: they have the right to review the case file, file motions and use the assistance of a defence lawyer. These rights work in your favour if used in time. A lawyer for driving licence deprivation advises when to file a motion, which documents to submit and how to rebut the prosecution's arguments.

Understanding your rights changes the course of the case. A driver may not testify against themselves, may file recusals and may present evidence. A lawyer for licence deprivation helps to exercise these opportunities: prepares written motions, files them at the right moment and ensures that every action is recorded in the minutes.

Reviewing the case file before the hearing
Filing motions: to examine witnesses, order an expert examination, submit documents
Participation of a defence lawyer when the report is drawn up and at the court hearing
Presenting your own evidence and objections

Motor lawyer for driving licence deprivation: what to check in the report

The report and accompanying papers should be photographed immediately, without waiting for the review. A motor lawyer for licence deprivation looks at these documents first of all, because correcting a record after the fact is almost impossible. If the report lacks your signature, does not name the witnesses or attesting witnesses, and the time and place differ from the actual ones, this is recorded in writing.

Separately, check whether your rights were explained to you, whether a copy of the report was handed to you, and whether the details of the officer and the vehicle match. Minor discrepancies in a surname, number or date sometimes decide the outcome. Below is exactly what to check line by line.

Date, time and place of drawing up — whether they match the actual ones
Details of the officer, witnesses and attesting witnesses — whether they are stated in full
Your explanations and the note that your rights were explained
The note confirming that a copy of the report was handed over
References to the examination report and other attachments

What to check in the documents
Document	What to check	Typical defect	How to record it
Report	Date, time, place	Does not match reality	Photos and written remarks
Protocol	Signatures and witnesses	Blank fields	Note in the protocol
Examination report	Procedure and device	No calibration check, no attesting witnesses	Copy and remarks
Copies of documents	Service	Copy not handed over	Entry in the protocol

Record any discrepancy immediately — proving it later is harder.

Lawyer for licence deprivation: motions and work with the case materials

A lawyer for licence deprivation joins the case before trial, and their first step is work with the materials: the protocol, the officers' reports, explanations, video recording, examination results. A driver has the right to review the case materials, file motions and use the assistance of a defence lawyer — this right is worth using immediately, rather than at the court hearing when part of the evidence has already been collected and recorded. Reviewing the case shows what is missing from the materials and which arguments are worth making at all.

Motions are filed for a specific purpose, not as a list: to obtain camera footage, to summon the officer or the attesting witnesses, to order an expert examination, to admit documents into the case, to have evidence declared inadmissible. Timing matters: what is not raised in time may later be rejected by the court as untimely. A well-considered motion changes the picture of the case — it shows which circumstances the prosecution has not proven.

To obtain the video recording from the patrol car and city cameras
To summon the officer who drew up the protocol and the attesting witnesses
To order an expert examination on the disputed circumstances
To admit documents supporting the driver's version
On the inadmissibility of evidence obtained in violation of the rules

Lawyer for driver's licence deprivation in court: how the defence is built

At the court hearing in a case on deprivation of the right to drive, the judge examines the materials: the protocol, the breath test report, explanations, reports, video recordings. The judge assesses each piece of evidence, while the defence checks whether they correspond to the actual circumstances. The lawyer's position on deprivation of driving rights is built on refuting this evidence or on its inadmissibility.

A lawyer on deprivation of driving rights in court challenges the procedure: who drew up the protocol and how, the attesting witnesses, the time and place. If there are contradictions in the case, the defence draws the court's attention to them. This may lead to termination of the proceedings or reclassification.

Verification of the powers of the inspector and attesting witnesses.
Compliance of the protocol with the requirements of the Administrative Offences Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Assessment of the breath test report and its admissibility.
Analysis of video recording and witness testimony.

Lawyer on deprivation of driving rights: appealing the ruling

If a ruling on deprivation has already been issued, it can be appealed to a higher court. The deadline for filing an appeal is limited, and missing it closes off the possibility of challenging the decision. That is why a lawyer on deprivation of driving rights immediately assesses whether the driver is within the deadline and whether there are grounds for reinstatement if the time has passed.

The appeal is accompanied by a copy of the ruling, written arguments stating which evidence the court failed to consider or assessed incorrectly, and motions — for example, to summon the inspector, attesting witnesses or witnesses. It is useful to prepare in advance a diagram, video recording or other materials that refute the court's conclusions. The list of what is attached depends on the category of the case: in intoxication cases this is the breath test report and medical documents, in oncoming lane cases — the dashcam recording and data on the road markings.

a copy of the ruling with a note of delivery;
a written appeal with arguments against the court's conclusions;
motions to summon the inspector, attesting witnesses, witnesses;
a diagram, photos and video from the scene;
medical documents — in intoxication cases.

Motor lawyer on deprivation of driving rights: defence tactics by category of case

Categories of cases on deprivation of the right to drive differ not only in the sanction, but also in which evidence becomes key. When intoxication is at issue, the dispute revolves around procedure: the breath testing procedure is strictly regulated, and deviations from it directly affect the strength of the evidence. A lawyer on deprivation of driving rights in such a case first of all studies the report, the referral, the presence of attesting witnesses and the continuity of the examination.

Driving into the oncoming lane, leaving the scene of an accident or a violation resulting in harm to health are built on a different basis: the diagram, the inspector's testimony, the recording data. Here the lawyer challenges deprivation of rights through inconsistencies between the report, the diagram and the video recording, as well as through procedural defects in the protocol. Below is what matters in the main categories.

Intoxication: breath test report, compliance with procedure, attesting witnesses.
Oncoming lane: diagram, road markings, visibility, video recording.
Harm to health in an accident: medical documents, diagram, causation.
Leaving the scene of an accident: participants, damage, moment of discovery.

Key evidence by category
Category	Main document	What the defence checks
Intoxication	Breath test report	Procedure, witnesses, continuity
Oncoming lane	Scene diagram and police report	Road markings, visibility, video recording
Harm to health	Medical documents	Severity of harm and causation
Leaving the scene of an accident	Protocol and explanations	Participants, damage, timing

In every case, the defence relies on its own set of documents.

Lawyer for licence withdrawal for drink-driving: objections to the breath test report

The breath test report on the state of intoxication is the key document most often contested in court. The procedure is strictly regulated, and any deviation from it affects the evidentiary value of the report. The task of a lawyer for licence withdrawal for drink-driving is to show the court that the results were obtained in breach of the rules and cannot form the basis of the ruling.

Objections are built around specific defects: who conducted the breath test and in whose presence, whether the driver was informed of the procedure, and whether the device readings match its operating conditions. If the report contains errors or is signed by an unauthorised person, the court may rule it inadmissible evidence. It is at this stage that the work of a lawyer for licence withdrawal for drink-driving creates the opportunity to dismantle the charge.

Absence of witnesses or video recording during the breath test
Faulty or uncalibrated device, questionable readings
Breach of the procedure for referral for medical examination
The report contains corrections, lacks the driver's signature, or has someone else's details
The driver was not informed of their rights and was not given a copy of the report

Motor lawyer for driver's licence withdrawal: practice of defending drivers

Nine years of work on drivers' administrative cases have produced a body of data that speaks for itself about how often these situations arise: over 140 cases in which licence withdrawal was considered. Almost half of them — 48% — ended without withdrawal. This is not a promise of outcome, but a benchmark: the result depends on how carefully the materials are examined.

It makes sense to contact a motor lawyer for licence withdrawal immediately after the protocol is drawn up, while the deadlines have not expired and the details are not lost. The earlier the work begins, the more opportunities there are to influence the charge and the evidence.

The share of cases without withdrawal is no accident: in some of the protocols drawn up, the evidence, wording or charge do not withstand scrutiny. A motor lawyer for licence withdrawal is precisely occupied with finding such weak points in a specific case.

protocol and explanations of the participants
examination report and medical documents
video recordings and witness statements
copies of decisions and rulings

Lawyer for driving licence revocation: mistakes that hinder the defence

After the protocol is drawn up, the driver often makes the lawyer's work on licence revocation harder. Agreeing with everything written in the protocol and explanation deprives the defence of footholds: a signature under the officer's wording is later difficult to challenge, even if you did not have time to grasp the details on the spot. Refusing to sign, on the other hand, does not stop the case: a note of refusal appears in the file, and your objections are recorded nowhere. The most common mistake concerns the defence counsel: the driver thinks he can manage alone and comes to court without a lawyer.

Waiving defence counsel is not a saving of time but a loss of opportunities. A lawyer for licence revocation sees discrepancies between the protocol, the report and the video, files motions and questions the officer — things a driver usually does not do alone. If defence counsel was not involved from the very beginning, some arguments have to be pieced together from an already closed file.

Agreeing with all points of the protocol and the explanation without comments
Refusing to sign instead of putting objections in writing
Waiving the assistance of defence counsel at the review stage and in court
Attempts to settle on the spot instead of recording the violations

Lawyer for driving licence revocation in Almaty: where to turn for defence

When the protocol has already been drawn up or a decision to revoke the licence has been issued, it is important to choose defence counsel who handles exactly such cases. A lawyer for driving licence revocation in Almaty must know local practice: how judges assess the materials, which defects in the protocol lead to cancellation. At the first consultation, ask how many similar cases the specialist has handled and which arguments most often work.

Before the meeting, gather the documents: a copy of the protocol on an administrative offence, the examination report (if you underwent one), the decision in the case, the driving licence. If there is a video recording of the stop, explanations of witnesses, certificates — bring those too. A driver has the right to review the case file, file motions and use the assistance of defence counsel, so ask the lawyer to check whether all procedural documents were shown to you. A motoring lawyer for licence revocation will assess the prospects and propose a plan of action.

a copy of the protocol on an administrative offence;
the examination report and test results;
the decision in the case (if already issued);
a video recording of the stop or witness explanations;
the driving licence and vehicle documents.

The main thing is not to sign the protocol and examination report mechanically: every phrase in these documents later forms the basis of the court decision, and it is harder to challenge than to record your objections straight away.

Reviews

Drivers' reviews of defence in licence revocation cases

4.9

Google

4.9 · 128

Yandex

4.8 · 94

2GIS

4.9 · 156

Zoon

4.7 · 41

Kanat D. 21 July 2026

I was accused of refusing to take a breathalyzer test, I was in a panic. Asel went through the documents and immediately said that the referral was filled out with violations. She found these flaws and filed objections. The case was dropped, my license stayed with me. Very grateful, everything without unnecessary fluff.